One MAR Editor’s Take on the Submission Process

IMG_1577

This entry is a repost from Fiction Editor Laura Maylene Walter’s personal blog. Laura discusses her first year working for Mid-American Review as Assistant Fiction Editor, how MAR submissions defied her expectations, and general tips for writers interested in submitting to MAR. The opinions expressed here are Laura’s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the rest of the editorial staff. Now that we’ve gotten through that disclaimer, let’s dive into Laura’s take on MAR’s reading process:

We really do read everything. Like many writers, I’ve had my suspicions that certain journals don’t really read all their submissions – that they fill their magazine pages with solicited material and/or send huge chunks of submissions into the trash bin unread – but I’m happy to say this is definitely not the case at MAR. Not only do we read everything, but we approach each story in good faith, with good intentions, and with the hope that this one might be a “yes.”

The quality of writing is stronger than I expected. Over the years, I’ve heard plenty of horror stories about the draining and hopeless process of reviewing submissions. Thankfully, I haven’t experienced that. Not every story is for MAR, and not every story we receive feels ready yet, but the quality of the average submission is higher than I anticipated. Reading submissions is also a reminder of just how many people out there are writing and maintaining the hope that someone will say “yes.”

That infuriating “Sorry, this isn’t for me” line is true. I might recognize a story has many admirable qualities and is strong, but it either doesn’t float my boat or just wouldn’t fit with the aesthetic of the magazine. When I come across a story like this – one that’s strong but isn’t to my personal taste – I still forward it to staff members to see if anyone else feels differently.

We don’t always agree. Reading for MAR reminds me many times over how subjective this business is. Sometimes the differences are subtle – I might love with the voice of a piece while another reader is only vaguely interested – while other times it’s a dramatic difference in opinion. For example, I might be an emphatic “no” on a particular story that another editor is willing to fight for, or vice versa. To make it even more interesting, this same editor and I might generally have a similar aesthetic, so there’s no predicting how we will each react to an individual story.

A connection is by no means a golden ticket. Very rarely, someone on staff might personally know one of the writers we’re discussing, or perhaps stories from past MAR contributors or other writers with some sort of “connection” enter our reading pile. Believe it or not, these relationships don’t make the journey to publication in MAR easier. Not even close. We discuss everything based on its own merits and how it might fit in with our publication.

Cover letters don’t matter much. I view cover letters as unnecessary but sometimes helpful tools that might satisfy my curiosity about a writer. A long list of impressive credentials is all fine and good, but it doesn’t mean I’ll love the story that writer submitted. On the flip side, if a writer has no previous publications, I’ll hold out hope that this story could be her first winner. And if a writer leaves the cover letter section blank in our online Submissions Manager, I couldn’t care less. It’s the story that counts.

I don’t like sending rejections. I’ve received enough rejections in my writing career to cringe at the thought of a writer opening an email from me that includes a rejection. It’s not fun, and I don’t think any literary editor enjoys it. But it’s part of the job.

We’re doing our best. I know what it’s like to be stuck waiting eight months or longer for a response from a journal, but now, I also know what it’s like to face thousands and thousands of pending submission in the Submissions Manager. We don’t like to be behind, but because we actually read everything, get second or third or fourth opinions on work, and are open to free submissions year-round, it happens. Please be patient with us.

You’ve heard it before from other journals and editors, but it’s true: We really, really want to find stuff we love in the slush. It’s such a treat to stumble across a compelling story or strong voice while reading submissions.

Actually, we don’t use the word “slush.” Slush is the word I use to mentally refer to the huge pile of submissions sent through our Submission Manager because that’s what I’m used to. In reality, however, I haven’t heard that term thrown around by other readers at MAR. We view our submissions as simply that: submissions sent by hardworking writers.

Laura Maylene Walter, Fiction Editor

Original post: Submit to Me: Inside the Mid-American Review

Accepted: “At the End of the Street” by Jeff Oaks

Down Bellevue

In our “Accepted” column, Mid-American Review editors discuss why they selected stories, poems, or essays for publication. In this post, Assistant Poetry Editor Jenelle Clausen discusses a poem that appears in our Spring 2014 issue.

Genre: Poetry
Title: “At the End of the Street”
Author: Jeff Oaks
MAR issue: Vol. XXXIV, Number 2 (Spring 2014)
First lines: “In the old parking lot. Where there’s enough / darkness and distance to be struck by / the night sky…”

This poem, which is both short and poignant, deals with love and loss, and its central images are celestial bodies. Each line resonates with a compelling image, and the line breaks are skillful and meaningful. Just to read the final word in each line gives one a sense of the poem and its emotional content. This memorable poem is an example of word economy at its most impactful.

Oaks uses his poem’s title, “At the End of the Street,” to lead into the first line: “In the old parking lot….” We immediately have a sense of place. Oaks then goes on to mention the “night sky”—now we know the time of day. Thus grounding the “we” in place and time within the poem, Oaks shows us Venus, the Moon (capitalized to suggest its importance and that it’s specifically Earth’s moon), and Jupiter, describing them succinctly in terms of shape and colored light. These celestial bodies are “…Millions of miles away / and in opposite directions from us.” We’re not just in a parking lot anymore; we’re in the midst of a vast, unreachable (and thus unknowable) universe. Oaks has already said a lot in a small space.

It’s then that the poem takes a turn, and we move into the first complete sentence of the poem. It’s a casual question that segues into a serious declarative sentence that gets at the heart of the poem and features the two biggest and two of the most emotionally resonant words in the poem: “annihilates” and “responsibility.” What is this grief and its aftermath? In the final two lines of the poem, the author connects the inconceivably distant planets and Moon to a confession of human grief and aloneness: “We were talking about our parents dying then, / the grief of orphans hanging over us.”

Though this sonnet—which almost slips by unnoticed as such—is written in unrhymed free verse, the final two lines echo the Shakespearean tradition of the ending couplet. The speaker actually says very little about his or her shared grief; the visual description of the planets and Moon situated in the universe builds to inform those final two lines, and we feel their emotional impact.

What MAR editors said about “At the End of the Street”:

“The word choice was great. I can tell that the author chose every word carefully, like there couldn’t have been an alternative. And those final two lines really sneak up on you, but they’re not just thrown in—the whole poem builds up to them.”

“A lot of sonnets fall short, but not this one. The form—which is not strictly formal in the traditional sense—and the content are both really working, and they work together. Basically, the form seems inevitable. I can’t imagine this poem as not a sonnet.”

Jenelle Clausen, Assistant Poetry Editor

Photo: Sparky

MAR Announces Inaugural Art Contest

Icelandic book art

Calling all artists! MAR announces a new art contest for work inspired by writing published in our recent issues.

Prize: $500, display on blog and website, and share in proceeds of print sales
Final Judge: Artist Daniel Merriam
Entry Deadline: January 5, 2015
Entry Fee: $10 for up to three entries (combined in one submission)

The Finer Details:

Choose from among these six pieces from recent issues of Mid-American Review to inspire your artwork:

Fiction:
Mollie Ficek, “The Harvest Queen” (XXXIII.2)
Ryan Habermeyer, “In Search of Fortunes Not Yet Lost” (XXXIV.1)

Fineline:
Anika L. Eide, “Some Parents” (XXXIV.1)

Poetry:
Erin Lyndal Martin, “Colony Collapse—Aristaeus” (XXXIII.2)
G.C. Waldrep, “On Protestantism” (XXXIV.1)
Jude Nutter, “The Shipping Forecast” (winner of the 2013-2014 James Wright Poetry Award, XXXIV.2)

We invite artists to compose new work inspired by the writing of their choice from the list above. Medium/form may be painting, drawing, collage, sculpture, photography, textile, ceramics, metals, carpentry, glass—anything that may ultimately be translated to a two-dimensional image. Images may be submitted by post or on our submissions manager, as pdfs or jpgs. Cover letter/message should include brief biographical and contact information, and a 50-100 word artist’s statement about the method of composition and the inspiration behind it. Entries and cover letters need not be left anonymous.

A $10 entry fee for up to three pieces (combined in one submission) may be paid by check for postal submissions, or online for online submissions. Each entrant may choose to receive either a print of the winning piece or a one-year subscription to MAR. Our winning artist will receive $500 and display on the MAR website and blog. We will also produce a run of prints in various sizes for sale at events and on our website, and the artist will receive a share of these proceeds.

Contest is open to all artists, except those associated with the judge or Mid-American Review. Our judge’s decision is final.

For online submissions and online payment, please use our Submissions Manager. Send all postal entries with check or money order to: Mid-American Review Department of English Bowling Green State University Bowling Green, OH 43403

About the Judge: Daniel Merriam, a native of Maine, is an artist of the fantastic and the surreal. His watercolors have been exhibited across the country, and compiled in three books. His imagination blends the unexpected, the dark, the airy, the curious, and the luxurious with vibrant color and depth. His work graced the covers of MAR XXI.1, XXI.2, and XXV.1.

Good luck — we can’t wait to see the MAR-inspired art that comes our way.

Accepted: “Close Enough to See” by Roger Sollenberger

Close Enough to See

In our “Accepted” column, Mid-American Review editors discuss why they selected stories, poems, or essays for publication. In this post, past Fiction Editor Jason Marc Harris discusses a short story that appears in our Spring 2014 issue.

Genre: Short fiction
Title: “Close Enough to See”
Author: Roger Sollenberger
MAR issue: Vol. XXXIV, Number 2 (Spring 2014)
First line: “We know how it goes: no one sits next to the fat kid; the fat kid sits next to you.”

From the first line of Roger Sollenberger’s “Close Enough to See,” the narrator, Sol, manifests a continuum of interesting qualities: intelligent, self-deprecating, sarcastic, comedic, defensive, honest, even-tempered, and needy. Sol is thoroughly ambivalent about himself and the people around him. These characteristics are developed further when Sol encounters Nikki, who gravitates towards him because of his academic prowess in their community college statistics class. She wants to cheat off him, and he’s a virgin who has never had a girlfriend, but their rapport crosses into many dimensions beyond mutual opportunism. The progress of their relationship explores ethnic identity, sexuality, and class tensions. Besides Nikki, the story offers a range of other characters, such as Sol’s father, a retired geologist obsessed with catching a bear in their backyard. The light ironic tone of the narrative often belies the profundity of the topics the story delves into.

Many of our editors remarked on the use of the setting in this story. In particular, we see the Blue Ridge Mountains of West Virginia, which delineate the physical space these characters inhabit, but also imply how the lives of Nikki and Sol are bounded and dwarfed by rhythms and measures of the natural world that are nearly infinite. Sol and Nikki are part of a larger landscape and trajectory of change: “Nikki said her house smelled like a hell of a lot of cigarettes. She sat me instead on the couch on the porch, which sagged, then ran a hand under my chin and went inside for beers. I drummed my heels on the wood, looked out across the yard, settling into the light evening chill. Above the trees on the other side of the road I could make out the blue Appalachian mountains, half a billion years old and once higher than the Himalayas today, now worn down to these hills, these arcs, featureless and smooth and perfect.”

The sense of that sublime attrition over the immense scale of geologic time extends into the narrowness of Nikki’s house, and those looming ridges help define the interior worlds of Nikki and Sol as well: “The Appalachians rose way off to my right, which was west, land so dark it seemed part of the night itself, and it would have been impossible to tell where the mountains ended and the night began if it weren’t for the radio towers on the ridge, a line of red lights that marked the limit of the land, and I shivered once and lowered myself to my knees.” In this scene, Sol has accepted Nikki’s dare to attempt to meet the Devil at the crossroads. The revelation he experiences is not supernatural but deeply personal, and he learns more about himself and Nikki, a private world within the unknown darkness of the collective human psyche that their relationship explores.

Highlighted by the title, the story is also about blindness, physical and spiritual. Nikki, we learn, has trouble with her eyes, and both she and Sol have much to learn about each other and themselves. “Close Enough to See” is a deeply humane story, always engaging with its substantial characters and entertaining because of the comedic and insightful narrative voice.

What MAR editors said about “Close Enough to See”:

“The characters are interesting and well-drawn. Setting is beautifully rendered.”
“Story really drew me in.”
“Gritty.”
“There is a pathos here that I liked.”

Jason Marc Harris, Fiction Editor (2013-2014)

Fineline Deadline Extended to June 15, 2014

Let our Fineline contest give you wings.
Let our Fineline contest give you wings.

It’s summer and you’re busy — and whether “busy” means traveling, working, catching up on some reading, or simply lounging around in a baby pool with a margarita in hand, we get it. Mid-American Review is therefore happy to announce that our Fineline deadline has been extended until June 15 for our MAR friends. (As a reader of our new blog, that includes you!)

The Fineline Competition for Prose Poems, Short Shorts, and Anything In Between is the place to send your best short work. Each piece must be under 500 words; no line breaks in poems, please. Lindsay Hunter judges. First prize is $1,000 and publication in our special 35th anniversary issue. In fact, this issue will celebrate the prose poem/flash form in general, so we hope to publish several Fineline finalists as well as prose poems/short shorts that we accept through our general submission pool. So if you like short, send it to us!

Each Fineline entry packet of up to three pieces costs $10. We suggest you enter online using our submissions manager, but mailed entries are also accepted if received by June 15. Need more info? Go here. Otherwise, we look forward to reading your work!

Laura Maylene Walter, Fiction Editor