MAR Asks, Laura Madeline Wiseman Answers

Laura Madeline Wiseman
Laura Madeline Wiseman

Martian mascots, murder cases, James Bond, and geography spanning from Russia to Nebraska? It’s all part of our inaugural Mid-American Review contributor interview with author Laura Madeline Wiseman, whose creative nonfiction piece “From Russia with Love Melancholia” appeared in our Spring 2014 issue (Vol. XXXIV, Number 2). Here’s a quick sampling from the essay:

“Do you want to touch my monkey? Do you like his yellow shirt? What about his teeny pair of jeans? How about a picture with my monkey? He will climb up on your shoulder or sit on your hip, his little hand will clutch the silver heart of your necklace. Would you rather hold this red parrot? Listen, he says hello in Russian. He says goodbye, da-svi-da-nya.”

Let’s hit it!

1. Quick! Summarize your story/poem/essay in 10 words or fewer.

An essay on traveling to Russia for with love.

2. What can you share about this piece prior to its MAR publication?

I started drafting “From Russia with Love Melancholia” while I was traveling in Moscow and Sochi in 2011. At the beginning of the trip, I was often jetlagged and/or culture shocked. Taking just a few moments to record my impressions allowed me to think through the cultural differences and reflect on my experiences while I was there. When I returned home to the United States, I continued writing bits and pieces of the essay, focusing on the parts of my travels that lingered, or that I found myself returning to without conscious effort. Russia didn’t just go away after I returned to my normal Nebraska summer of gardening, bicycling, and working. Rather, like learning a new word, Russia seemed to filter into my everyday life. I found myself seeking out more of Russia in the form of renting movies like the 1963 James Bond film From Russia with Love, reading books like Elliot Holt’s You Are One of Them, and attending cultural events like The Russian National Ballet Theatre’s production of Sleeping Beauty. Even recently, I enjoyed the audiobook version of Donna Tartt’s The Goldfinch for the literary quality and the story, of course, but also for the reader’s performance of Theo’s Russian-born friend Boris.

3. You’re at a family reunion and some long-lost relative asks about your writing. What do you say?

Actually, something like this recently happened. I was giving a reading in Omaha at a local art gallery this spring and a woman approached me before the event to ask if we were related, given that we had the same last name. She said, “I came to this reading because of your last name.” She asked specifically if I was a descendant of a Charles “Chick” Wiseman. I was. He was my great-grandfather. She was a descendant of his elder brother. We talked a little about that connection and then I explained that I’d recently written a book about our mutual ancestor, Matilda Fletcher Wiseman, who was a nineteenth century lecturer, suffragist, and poet. Matilda was my great-great-great-grandmother and Chick’s great-grandmother. My book Queen of the Platform follows Matilda’s career by exploring the connection to the men in her life: her brother, a civil war solider, her first husband, a school teacher and a lawyer, and her second husband, a minister who became her agent. Matilda spoke to support herself and her family. On the stage she spoke among other lecturers of her time, such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. I didn’t have extra copies of Queen of the Platform with me at the reading, but I did have a copy of my chapbook Men and Their Whims, a series that focuses specifically on the bond between Matilda and her younger brother, Geo, who was charged with murder. Handing over a copy of the chapbook for free to my recently discovered Wiseman cousin, I said, “Here,” adding, “Thank you for coming to my reading.” I also told her how she could find Matilda’s book about the murder case.

4. What do you consider your biggest writing-related success?

I always feel like my latest released book or chapbook is my biggest success. Thus, I’m delighted to have my newest book of poetry, American Galactic, in the world. Opening with an epigraph from Charles Simic, “Lots of people around here have been taken for rides in UFOs,” American Galactic, explores Martians, crop circles, abductions, and how humans face an extraterrestrial invasion via sci-fi poetry.

5. Tell us one strange thing about yourself that does not involve writing.

I successfully biked every mile of RAGBRAI this summer, biking 446 miles across the state of Iowa in seven days. My team’s mascot was a Martian.

6. Tell us one strange thing about yourself that does involve writing.

I write every day.

7. Do you have another favorite piece of writing in this issue of MAR? If so, name it and tell us why.

I adore Jeannine Hall Gailey’s poem “Every Human is a Black Box.” I’ve been a fan of Gailey’s work ever since I read her fabulous Becoming the Villainess. In the MAR poem, I love how she explores and charts the ways each of our bodies are marked by a world that none of us can fully read.

Great responses. Now, if we could only have a shot of you with your MAR issue….

Laura Madeline Wiseman
MAR is a gal’s best friend.

Perfect. Thanks for your time!

Laura Maylene Walter, Fiction Editor

Accepted: “Tracking the ‘Choose Life’ Balloons: Our Findings Thus Far” by Brian Costello

balloons

In our “Accepted” column, Mid-American Review editors discuss why they selected stories, poems, or essays for publication. In this post, Managing Editor Sasha Khalifeh discusses a story that appears in our Spring 2014 issue.

Genre: Fiction
Title: “Tracking the “Choose Life” Balloons: Our Findings Thus Far”
Author: Brian Costello
MAR Issue: Vol. XXXIV, Number 2 (Spring 2014)
First line: “On the afternoon of March 14th, 1983, 322 students of St. Sebastian Catholic School in Peoria, Illinois gathered in the parking lot between their school and their church and released 314 primary-colored balloons into the gray late-winter sky.”

An unexpected ode to music and Midwestern life, “Tracking the “Choose Life” Balloons: Our Findings Thus Far” begins with a quirky and attention-grabbing premise, a Catholic school balloon release, and transitions into an enchanting portrait of the Midwest. As the piece progresses, the reader is thrown into the lives of well over a dozen characters, from Catholic schoolchildren to heartbroken adolescents to the front-men of rock bands. The result is a richly-imagined and captivating piece that balances humor, history, and music, all against the backdrop of 1980s Illinois.

The story was a hit with our fiction staff, resulting in a rare unanimous vote for acceptance. The MAR editors were immediately drawn in by the story’s unique premise, but that engagement quickly progressed to an appreciation for author Brian Costello’s neat prose and an investment in his succinctly-developed characters. Like the lines of the songs that permeate the story, each section of the story is sharp and strong, but woven together the overall effect is greater than the sum of its parts—a piece both memorable and compelling.

One of the greatest strengths of the story is its language: Costello’s prose deftly navigates a range of emotions—joy, heartbreak, nostalgia, loss, passion—without ever becoming weighed down by sentimentality or losing sight of its distinct voice. A balloon drifting past a high school senior fantasizing about spending the night with his girlfriend becomes a simple but profound moment of reflection: “As Porterfield watched the balloon land and the song moved into the chorus, there was something about the scene that made him swell with, maybe not pride, but the feeling that you’re exactly where you want to be—Peoria, the Midwest, the ‘80s—and it doesn’t get much better, does it?”

At the same time, a teenage girl giving her first haircut to her punk-rock boyfriend begins her career as a hairstylist even as she ends her relationship: “As the song “Party with Me Punker” played, Oberkfell felt a confidence and self-assurance in her work that she had never felt before.…at that moment [she] correctly surmised that her relationship with Richie Asshole would be short-lived, but to the present day, Oberkfell is an in-demand stylist throughout the Detroit suburbs.”

Costello’s piece, though only a few pages long, is brimming with stories spanning age, place, and gender, all of them framed by an unforgettable premise. Through his prose, readers are immersed in a different world, one permeated by music and memory—a world that one is happy to inhabit, if only for a little while.

What MAR editors said about “Tracking the ‘Choose Life’ Balloons: Our Findings Thus Far”:

“…a combination of deadpan humor and clean prose…a sense of a clear narrative that follows inevitably from the release of the balloons.”

“The tone and concept are engaging…and then it turns out that the whole story is about something completely different than what you thought it would be.”

Sasha Khalifeh, Managing Editor

Photo: Chi-Chi Chuang

One MAR Editor’s Take on the Submission Process

IMG_1577

This entry is a repost from Fiction Editor Laura Maylene Walter’s personal blog. Laura discusses her first year working for Mid-American Review as Assistant Fiction Editor, how MAR submissions defied her expectations, and general tips for writers interested in submitting to MAR. The opinions expressed here are Laura’s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the rest of the editorial staff. Now that we’ve gotten through that disclaimer, let’s dive into Laura’s take on MAR’s reading process:

We really do read everything. Like many writers, I’ve had my suspicions that certain journals don’t really read all their submissions – that they fill their magazine pages with solicited material and/or send huge chunks of submissions into the trash bin unread – but I’m happy to say this is definitely not the case at MAR. Not only do we read everything, but we approach each story in good faith, with good intentions, and with the hope that this one might be a “yes.”

The quality of writing is stronger than I expected. Over the years, I’ve heard plenty of horror stories about the draining and hopeless process of reviewing submissions. Thankfully, I haven’t experienced that. Not every story is for MAR, and not every story we receive feels ready yet, but the quality of the average submission is higher than I anticipated. Reading submissions is also a reminder of just how many people out there are writing and maintaining the hope that someone will say “yes.”

That infuriating “Sorry, this isn’t for me” line is true. I might recognize a story has many admirable qualities and is strong, but it either doesn’t float my boat or just wouldn’t fit with the aesthetic of the magazine. When I come across a story like this – one that’s strong but isn’t to my personal taste – I still forward it to staff members to see if anyone else feels differently.

We don’t always agree. Reading for MAR reminds me many times over how subjective this business is. Sometimes the differences are subtle – I might love with the voice of a piece while another reader is only vaguely interested – while other times it’s a dramatic difference in opinion. For example, I might be an emphatic “no” on a particular story that another editor is willing to fight for, or vice versa. To make it even more interesting, this same editor and I might generally have a similar aesthetic, so there’s no predicting how we will each react to an individual story.

A connection is by no means a golden ticket. Very rarely, someone on staff might personally know one of the writers we’re discussing, or perhaps stories from past MAR contributors or other writers with some sort of “connection” enter our reading pile. Believe it or not, these relationships don’t make the journey to publication in MAR easier. Not even close. We discuss everything based on its own merits and how it might fit in with our publication.

Cover letters don’t matter much. I view cover letters as unnecessary but sometimes helpful tools that might satisfy my curiosity about a writer. A long list of impressive credentials is all fine and good, but it doesn’t mean I’ll love the story that writer submitted. On the flip side, if a writer has no previous publications, I’ll hold out hope that this story could be her first winner. And if a writer leaves the cover letter section blank in our online Submissions Manager, I couldn’t care less. It’s the story that counts.

I don’t like sending rejections. I’ve received enough rejections in my writing career to cringe at the thought of a writer opening an email from me that includes a rejection. It’s not fun, and I don’t think any literary editor enjoys it. But it’s part of the job.

We’re doing our best. I know what it’s like to be stuck waiting eight months or longer for a response from a journal, but now, I also know what it’s like to face thousands and thousands of pending submission in the Submissions Manager. We don’t like to be behind, but because we actually read everything, get second or third or fourth opinions on work, and are open to free submissions year-round, it happens. Please be patient with us.

You’ve heard it before from other journals and editors, but it’s true: We really, really want to find stuff we love in the slush. It’s such a treat to stumble across a compelling story or strong voice while reading submissions.

Actually, we don’t use the word “slush.” Slush is the word I use to mentally refer to the huge pile of submissions sent through our Submission Manager because that’s what I’m used to. In reality, however, I haven’t heard that term thrown around by other readers at MAR. We view our submissions as simply that: submissions sent by hardworking writers.

Laura Maylene Walter, Fiction Editor

Original post: Submit to Me: Inside the Mid-American Review